与同事在工作时间之外社交

Both views are addressed with a clear position, and main ideas are supported with relevant though somewhat generalised examples.

The response is logically organised with clear paragraphing and a range of cohesive devices, though some linking is slightly mechanical.

There is a sufficient range of topic-appropriate vocabulary used with reasonable precision, though some expressions are formulaic.

A variety of sentence structures, including conditionals and relative clauses, is used accurately with only minor, non-impeding slips.

The response addresses both views and states a clear, sustained opinion, but the supporting ideas are relevant yet somewhat underdeveloped and generalised.

Ideas progress logically across well-managed paragraphs with a range of cohesive devices used naturally, though cohesion within paragraphs is occasionally loose.

Vocabulary is sufficiently flexible and mostly precise, with natural collocation, though it occasionally favours informal or vague expressions over more precise academic phrasing.

A wide range of grammatical structures, including conditionals and complex noun phrases, is used with strong control and only rare, minor slips.

Both views are fully addressed with relevant explanation and examples, and a clear, sustained opinion is presented and reinforced in the conclusion.

The response is logically organised with clear paragraphing and cohesive devices, though progression is somewhat formulaic and ideas are developed in a predictable sequence.

Vocabulary is sufficiently flexible and precise for the topic, with some repetition of phrases such as camaraderie and work-life balance limiting range at the higher bands.

A wide range of sentence structures is used with generally good control and only occasional awkward phrasing that does not impede meaning.