In recent years, advancements in technology have changed how people connect with each other. This has has also reduced the depth of those relationships. In my opinion, this is a harmful change due to the fact that it to communicate their personal feelings. Technology’s influence has enabled people to make they possibly could in the past. This is largely owing to social media, which revolutionizes communication and helps people to with each other regardless of their geographical locations. Another change in human relationships caused by modern technology is that the number of has been substantially . With so many people to care about, social media deters users from strengthening bonds. For instance, a stark difference can be observed in Vietnam, where most young adults 20 years ago had much deeper connections than their modern counterparts. The changes made to the types of relationships people make nowadays is largely a disadvantageous one, for it deters people from having deep connections. Lacking valuable bonds means that they have almost no one to depressive episodes that are inevitable for most humans, of making unwise decisions. Examples of this can be found all over the world, where the cases of depression that cause suicidal behaviors are becoming , and one of the primary contributing factors is victims having no one to share their burdens with. In conclusion, despite having to connect, people are ; thus, the quality of relationships diminishes and harms their wellbeing.
Technology and Changing Types of Relationships
Nowadays the way people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development?
Annotated response
15 correction notes
Overall assessment
Why this response received Band 7.0
The response is strongest in its clear position and well-sequenced argument, supported by a relevant Vietnam example and a plausible link between shallow relationships and mental health. The main limitation is recurring imprecise phrasing and grammatical slips, such as 'much more friends' and 'keep touch', which reduce the polish of otherwise sophisticated writing.
IELTS criteria
How each score was decided
Task Response
7.0Both parts of the question are fully addressed with a clear position, extended ideas about breadth versus depth of relationships, and a relevant country-based example, though support is occasionally asserted rather than substantiated.
Coherence and Cohesion
7.0The essay progresses logically from paraphrase to body paragraphs to a conclusion, with generally clear referencing and linking, though some connectors such as 'for it' and 'and thereby increase' feel slightly forced.
Lexical Resource
7.0There is good awareness of style and less common items like 'revolutionizes communication', 'deters users from strengthening bonds', and 'confide', but occasional imprecise collocations such as 'much more friends' and 'keep touch' persist.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
7.0A range of complex structures, including relative clauses and subordinate constructions, is used flexibly, although errors in agreement ('changes...is', 'increase'), articles, and phrasing recur without impeding meaning.