Imported Food in Supermarkets: Positive or Negative Development

In many countries nowadays, consumers can go to a supermarket and buy food produced all over the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

Annotated response

12 correction notes

Showing 12 correction notes.

In recent years, supermarkets in many nations have started offering a variety of . I firmly believe that this trend is a positive development due to the numerous advantages it brings. Firstly, the availability of international food products allows consumers to access a that were previously unavailable. For instance, in Northern European countries, exotic fruits such as mangoes and papayas, which are not locally grown, can now be easily purchased in supermarkets. This not only but also promotes healthier eating habits by providing a . Secondly, the has significant economic benefits for the countries that produce them. Many tropical countries, such as Costa Rica and Vietnam, rely heavily on the export of agricultural products like bananas and coffee. By exporting these goods, these countries can boost their economies, create jobs, and improve the for their citizens. Furthermore, the in supermarkets fosters are , they become more curious about the cultures and traditions . This can be seen in the growing popularity of cuisines such as Japanese sushi, Mexican tacos, and Italian pasta in various countries. promotes cultural appreciation and broadens people’s perspectives. In conclusion, the ability to buy food produced worldwide in supermarkets is undoubtedly a positive development. It not only provides consumers with a variety of food choices and supports the economies of producing countries but also encourages cultural exchange and understanding. These benefits collectively enhance the .

Overall assessment

Why this response received Band 7.5

The response's strongest aspect is its well-developed, clearly organised argument supporting a firm position, with relevant examples throughout. The main limitation is that the argument remains somewhat one-sided and predictable, without acknowledging counterpoints, which limits full development of the issue.

IELTS criteria

How each score was decided

Task Response

7.0

The position is clear and consistent, all main ideas are relevant and supported with examples, though the one-sided treatment leaves some aspects of the development unexplored.

Coherence and Cohesion

7.0

Ideas progress logically across well-structured paragraphs with clear cohesion, though connectors such as 'Firstly' and 'Furthermore' are somewhat formulaic.

Lexical Resource

7.5

Vocabulary is flexible and precise, including topic-specific items such as 'standard of living' and 'culinary exploration', with only minor imperfections in collocation.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy

7.5

A wide range of complex structures is used with good control and accuracy, and errors are rare and non-impeding.