Should the Main Aim of Science Be Improving Lives

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Annotated response

12 correction notes

Showing 12 correction notes.

Science has always helped humanity to and . Therefore, I agree with the notion that the main goal of science should be improving human life by

science has shown its ability to in healthcare. vaccines, antibiotics, and surgical techniques have drastically lowered mortality rates and extended life expectancy. scientific research, diseases once deemed incurable or fatal have been providing hope and a better quality of life for

Moreover, science has led to significant progress in communication and technology, resulting in improved convenience and connectivity. Take the Internet, a product of scientific innovation, for example—it has transformed how we obtain information, communicate, and It has created opportunities for education, fostering connections between individuals and cultures. The of smartphones and other devices has empowered people, making information, services, and social networks easily accessible and enhancing their daily lives.

To conclude, science holds enormous potential to improve lives across different areas. The ongoing quest for scientific knowledge has resulted in innovations in healthcare, technology, and environmental conservation. By these scientific discoveries for the benefit of humanity, we can create a world that is healthier, more interconnected, and more eco-friendly.

Overall assessment

Why this response received Band 7.0

The strongest aspect is the response's clear, consistent position supported by well-chosen examples from healthcare and technology, expressed with fluent and precise language. The main limitation is its brevity at 221 words, along with a conclusion that introduces environmental conservation without any supporting body paragraph.

IELTS criteria

How each score was decided

Task Response

6.0

The position is clear and main ideas are developed with relevant examples, but the response is 29 words short of the minimum and the conclusion raises environmental conservation that is never developed, leaving coverage uneven.

Coherence and Cohesion

7.0

Ideas progress logically across cohesive paragraphs with appropriate linking devices and a clear overall structure.

Lexical Resource

7.0

Vocabulary is flexible and precise, using natural collocations such as extended life expectancy and scientific innovation, with only minimal inaccuracy.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy

7.0

A wide range of sentence structures is used with generally good control, including complex forms and effective subordination, with only occasional minor slips.