Reducing or Stopping Air Travel for the Environment

Some people have decided to reduce the number of times they fly every year or to stop flying altogether. Do you think the environmental benefits of this development outweigh the disadvantages for individuals and businesses?

Annotated response

12 correction notes

Showing 12 correction notes.

With about climate change, some individuals have chosen to reduce or in order to protect the environment. undeniable ecological benefits, it can also create challenges for individuals and businesses. I believe the environmental advantages .

Air travel is among the most carbon-intensive forms of transport, contributing significantly to global emissions. Reducing flights lowers greenhouse gas emissions and helps to slow global warming. governments and airlines to invest in and alternative transportation, such as high-speed rail.

However, the should not be overlooked. For businesses, particularly those that rely on international travel for meetings or , fewer flights may mean longer travel times and higher costs. On a personal level, people may find it harder to visit family abroad or experience different cultures. many of these drawbacks can be mitigated . The rise of remote work and has reduced the need for business travel. Additionally, more people are exploring local destinations, supporting domestic tourism while lowering their environmental footprint .

In conclusion, although there are inconveniences associated with reducing air travel, the long-term benefits for the environment far outweigh them. Choosing to fly less is a that .

Overall assessment

Why this response received Band 7.0

The response presents a clear position with well-organised arguments, relevant examples such as remote work and domestic tourism, and consistently accurate, flexible language. Its main limitation is that it remains noticeably under the expected length, leaving ideas developed only briefly rather than in depth.

IELTS criteria

How each score was decided

Task Response

6.5

The question is directly answered with a clear position and relevant supporting ideas, but the response is 40 words short of the minimum, which limits the depth of development.

Coherence and Cohesion

7.0

Ideas progress logically across four well-managed paragraphs with appropriate cohesive devices such as 'However', 'Even so', and 'Additionally'.

Lexical Resource

7.0

Vocabulary is sufficiently flexible and precise, featuring phrases like 'carbon-intensive', 'greenhouse gas emissions', and 'mitigated', with only a stray spacing error.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy

7.0

A range of complex structures, including concessive clauses and relative clauses, is used accurately with only very minor punctuation issues.