It is argued that parents should be the ones to familiarise their children with basic teachings of morals and ethics and how to implement them to become better individuals , while many believe educational institutes are the best . While parents can pay individual attention to their kids, I believe that schools provide an ideal environment . On the one hand, parents serve as role models and they are perfectly capable of paying undivided attention to their kids. That is to say that they can tell their kids stories containing lessons about differentiating right from wrong and good from bad. Furthermore, by demonstrating responsible behaviour, elders are instilling good habits in their young. As a result, children follow their elders and grow up to be better human beings. For example, parents should tell their kids to eat quietly and not make unnecessary noises which can develop into a good habit. However , I believe that parents cannot consistently teach and monitor their kids’ behaviour patterns due to lack of time. On the other hand, educational centres provide a specialised environment for minors in both academic and moral fields. That is to say that a child is to learn and grow . By interacting with fellow students and actively participating in multiple are able to perform to the best of their abilities. For instance, primary schools around the world include social activities and role plays in their curriculum to teach students how to become model citizens. Therefore, this option is preferable because it benefits the child in the long run as well as the In conclusion, although parents can in an effective manner, learning them at schools would make them rather more confident and productive .
Teaching Children to Be Good Members of Society
Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Annotated response
11 correction notes
Overall assessment
Why this response received Band 7.0
The strongest aspect is the well-organised discussion of both views with a clearly stated and consistently maintained opinion, supported by relevant examples. The main limitation is occasional awkward phrasing and imprecise collocation, such as 'ideal environment in learning' and 'learn them from', which slightly reduces the polish of otherwise flexible language.
IELTS criteria
How each score was decided
Task Response
7.0The response addresses all parts of the task, discusses both views with developed ideas and examples, and presents a clear, consistent position throughout.
Coherence and Cohesion
7.0Ideas are logically organised with clear paragraphing and a range of cohesive devices used flexibly, though some linkers are slightly mechanical.
Lexical Resource
7.0Vocabulary is sufficiently flexible with some precise items like 'instilling good habits' and 'undivided attention', but occasional awkward collocations and imprecision remain.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
7.0A variety of complex structures is used with good control, and errors such as the double punctuation and minor article slips are occasional and non-impeding.