Providing Free Water Supply to Every Home

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore, every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge. Do you agree or disagree?

Annotated response

12 correction notes

Showing 12 correction notes.

It is widely recognised that clean water is a fundamental human right and that all people should be provided with a free water supply . but acknowledge that it is nonetheless highly unlikely that this will happen soon. it is a basic human right, free of charge to all citizens. A government’s duty should be first and foremost to protect its people and of the various essentials for life, as fresh water. It is even more important than food and shelter. , people when they do not need to worry about water access and this will be beneficial for governments, meaning that it is not just the ethically right thing to do but it should be logically justifiable from a practical standpoint. , it does seem unlikely that all governments can achieve such a feat. Even in countries like China, which have and extremely powerful governments, the water that people get in their homes is not potable. In poorer nations, it is not only but quite often unclean, meaning that it can only be used for . In many parts of the world, it is currently impractical to even provide an unclean water supply and so people have to collect it from elsewhere and bring it home or else they must gather rainwater during certain seasons. Thus, even if it is ethical for all governments to provide clean water and practical for some of them, it is not realistic that it will happen in the near future. In conclusion, that water should be provided to all homes free of charge but admits that it almost certainly will not happen in certain parts of the world.

Overall assessment

Why this response received Band 7.0

The response presents a well-developed argument with a clear position, supported by relevant reasoning about ethics, practicality, and feasibility. Its strongest aspect is the coherent progression and flexible language; the main limitation is that the agreement becomes somewhat diluted by the extended focus on why the goal is unrealistic rather than deepening the case for it.

IELTS criteria

How each score was decided

Task Response

7.0

The position of agreement is clear and supported with developed ideas on ethical and practical grounds, though the second body paragraph focuses mainly on feasibility, slightly narrowing the extension of the core argument.

Coherence and Cohesion

7.0

Ideas are logically organised with clear paragraphing and a range of cohesive devices used naturally, although transitions such as 'In spite of all that' occasionally simplify the logical relationships.

Lexical Resource

7.0

Vocabulary is flexible and generally precise, with effective use of terms like 'potable', 'ethically right', and 'justifiable', with only minor imprecision.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy

7.0

A wide range of structures is used with strong control, including complex conditionals and relative clauses, and errors are rare and non-impeding.