Before talking about the essential , you have to think about the meaning, and the purpose, of any kind of punishment. If you consider that the purpose is to prevent the guilty , you can be in favour of the . But you have to think about another aspect of the problem: a punishment is also useful to , to make them fear the law. In fact, of a young in a violent atmosphere, influenced by older delinquents, He lives , he's got no aim but to survive. This is the kind of person who could possibly kill someone for money, or Why would he fear prison? Life would be easier for him there. In addition, in many cases, when you behave normally, you can benefit from . This young misfit needs to be impressed, he needs to know that the law is a frontier. When you cross it, you can lose your life. That is why capital punishment between robbery and murder. If you abolish it, you suppress the difference between these two types of crime, which are completely different.
But there is also a limit to define: even if death penalty is unavoidable, it would be a crime to apply it to . If there is no premeditation or past facts which can justify such a punishment, it is far too strict to . That is why the lawmakers have to establish precisely the context in which capital punishment . That is the price to pay to limit violence without using excessive violence.