New York City Population by District 1800-2000

The first table below shows changes in the total population of New York City from 1800 to 2000. The second and third tables show changes in the population of the five districts of the city (Manhattan, Brooklyn, Bronx, Queens, Staten Island) over the same period. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Cambridge IELTS 20 Academic Test 1 Writing Task 1 visual

Annotated response

8 correction notes

Showing 8 correction notes.

The tables illustrate how the total population of New York City and its five districts (Manhattan, Brooklyn, , Queens, and Staten Island) changed from 1800 to 2000.

Overall, while the total population of New York City and its four outer districts saw a considerable rise between 1800 and 2000, the population of Manhattan declined over the same period. The most striking feature is that the other districts underwent the most dramatic growth, becoming home to the vast majority of the city’s residents by 2000.

In 1800, New York City had a relatively small population of about 79,000, most of whom lived in Manhattan, which made up around three-quarters of the total. The remaining four districts together accounted for only 24%. By 1900, the city’s population had expanded remarkably to Manhattan’s population although its share declined to 54% as other districts began to attract more residents, reaching about 1.6 million in total.

By 2000, the total number of inhabitants had more than doubled again, reaching over 8 million. Manhattan’s population fell slightly to around 1.54 million, representing just 19% of the total. In contrast, the other districts experienced substantial growth, soaring to over 6.4 million people, or 81% of the city’s population.

Overall assessment

Why this response received Band 8.0

The response is a strong, well-organised summary that accurately reports the key data, includes a clear overview of the contrasting trend for Manhattan, and makes effective comparisons across the period. Its main limitation is the absence of any individual district detail beyond Manhattan, which slightly limits full coverage of the visual, while the language is precise and controlled throughout.

IELTS criteria

How each score was decided

Task Achievement

8.0

The response covers the main trends with an accurate overview, correctly reported figures and percentages, and relevant comparisons, with only minor coverage gaps regarding the individual outer districts.

Coherence and Cohesion

8.0

Ideas progress logically from overview to chronological detail, with cohesive devices such as 'Overall', 'In contrast', and 'By 2000' used flexibly and without overuse.

Lexical Resource

8.0

Vocabulary is precise and varied, using phrases like 'rose steeply', 'soaring to', and 'accounted for' naturally, with only very occasional less apt choices such as 'Interestingly'.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy

8.0

The response demonstrates a wide range of complex structures, including relative clauses, participle phrases, and contrastive constructions, controlled with only rare minor slips.